What is a major disadvantage of cost-based negotiation strategies?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for UCF's MAR3203 Supply Chain and Operations Management Exam 4 with essential study materials. Review concepts with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, complete with explanations. Maximize your exam readiness today!

Choosing a cost-based negotiation strategy often leads to a focus primarily on achieving the lowest possible prices for goods or services. While this approach might yield immediate financial benefits, a significant disadvantage is the potential for damaging supplier relationships. When negotiations center on price alone, suppliers may feel undervalued, leading to frustration and a lack of willingness to collaborate in the future. This strain can reduce the likelihood of favorable terms and innovation that typically arise from strong partnerships, as suppliers may withhold value-added services, quality enhancements, or improvements in delivery.

Emphasizing cost can overshadow other critical aspects of supply chain relationships, such as reliability, quality, and long-term collaboration. By ignoring these elements in favor of merely minimizing costs, organizations risk alienating their suppliers, which can ultimately affect the sustainability of the supply chain. Therefore, while cost savings are important, focusing solely on them can hinder the development of mutually beneficial relationships crucial for long-term success.